From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
{ NULL } only clears the first member of the structure.
Even though the first member of the snd_soc_dapm_update struct is a
pointer,it is more robust to use the empty struct initializer that
clears all the struct members.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index 92894d9..2f34590 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -3165,7 +3165,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
unsigned int invert = mc->invert;
unsigned int val, rval = 0;
int connect, rconnect = -1, change, reg_change = 0;
- struct snd_soc_dapm_update update = { NULL };
+ struct snd_soc_dapm_update update = {};
int ret = 0;
val = (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] & mask);
@@ -3292,7 +3292,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
unsigned int *item = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item;
unsigned int val, change, reg_change = 0;
unsigned int mask;
- struct snd_soc_dapm_update update = { NULL };
+ struct snd_soc_dapm_update update = {};
int ret = 0;
if (item[0] >= e->items)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
