Hi Mark,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:49:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:19:57PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c: In function 'wm9705_soc_probe':
>> sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c:330:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_soc_new_ac97_component'; did you mean 'snd_soc_new_ac97_codec'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
wm9705->ac97 = snd_soc_new_ac97_component(component, WM9705_VENDOR_ID,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
snd_soc_new_ac97_codec
I've dropped this and the other patch that had the same issue.
I wonder why 0day didn't notice this on the list...
Sorry but all the robot can notice is when an error disappears
in the _same_ branch that introduced the error. It does not try to
understand comments in the mailing list. Internally, it associates
errors to git branches and commits. If a problematic patch is dropped
in branch A but still remains in branch B, we should probably still
report the issue in B?
Thanks,
Fengguang
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
