Hi Mark
> > sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c: In function 'wm9705_soc_probe':
> > >> sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c:330:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_soc_new_ac97_component'; did you mean 'snd_soc_new_ac97_codec'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > wm9705->ac97 = snd_soc_new_ac97_component(component, WM9705_VENDOR_ID,
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > snd_soc_new_ac97_codec
>
> I've dropped this and the other patch that had the same issue. I wonder
> why 0day didn't notice this on the list...
Oops, I didn't mention (?) but ac97 related code were
modified, and its related driver needs to be based on it.
Now, mark/topic/ac97 branch has it
----------------------------------------------------
commit c95869e5c04fb0000370e7310dc892b417b8128a
Author: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jan 29 02:58:25 2018 +0000
ASoC: ac97: replace codec to component
Now we can replace Codec to Component. Let's do it.
Note:
xxx_codec_xxx() -> xxx_component_xxx()
.idle_bias_off = 0 -> .idle_bias_on = 1
.ignore_pmdown_time = 0 -> .use_pmdown_time = 1
- -> .endianness = 1
- -> .non_legacy_dai_naming = 1
To keep compatibilty, this patch adds snd_soc_xxx_ac97_codec()
macro. These will be removed when all codec code was removed.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
----------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
