Thanks for your review comments,
On 03/01/18 17:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 12/14/2017 09:34 AM, srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c b/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5b2036317f71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+ */
+#include <linux/clk.h>
No clk usage though?
Will remove it in next version.
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <sound/soc.h>
[...]
+static int apq8096_sbc_parse_of(struct snd_soc_card *card)
+{
+ struct device *dev = card->dev;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(card, "qcom,model");
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(dev, "Error parsing card name: %d\n", ret);
So this prints an error, and the caller also prints an error when it
fails. Double error messages?
looks redundant, will remove it.
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int msm_snd_apq8096_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct snd_soc_card *card;
+
+ card = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!card)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ card->dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+ ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(card->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
Why do we need to do this? Can you add some sort of comment in the code
about why?
Even though dsp supports 64 bit addresses, but the sid sits at offset of
32, which brings this restriction of supporting only 32 bit iova.
thanks,
srini
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
