[PATCH 4/6] slimbus: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>

A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/slimbus/messaging.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c b/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c
index 8b2c77f516b9..a9a6dc4af0da 100644
--- a/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c
+++ b/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int slim_do_transfer(struct slim_controller *ctrl, struct slim_msg_txn *txn)
 	if (need_tid) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->txn_lock, flags);
 		tid = idr_alloc(&ctrl->tid_idr, txn, 0,
-				SLIM_MAX_TIDS, GFP_KERNEL);
+				SLIM_MAX_TIDS, GFP_ATOMIC);
 		txn->tid = tid;
 
 		if (!txn->msg->comp)
-- 
2.15.0

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux