On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:17:37PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Well, honestly speaking, that complete morphing scares me. If it's a > simple additional call, it's easier to track the code flow. But your > patch essentially fakes the legacy codec and bus structs and twists > the control by that switch... which looks too fragile to me. Especially when it's layered on top of all the other x86 code which is also complicated and fragile - feels like there's lots of places things can go wrong and lots of potential unexpected interactions.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
