Hi Morimoto-san
On 12/07/2017 01:58 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Hi Jiada
Further more, if the passed 'byte' amount to
rsnd_ssi_pointer_update() is more than byte_per_period.
the calculation of next_period_byte isn't correct.
Is it really happen ??
Basically, I have no objection about this patch,
but this explanation is very strange for me...
No, I didn't see the issue,
but the implementation of rsnd_ssi_pointer_update(), behaves like
it knows all caller will always pass 'byte' no larger than byte_per_period,
without any check internally.
I am ok to remove this explanation from commit message,
what do you think?
Thanks,
Jiada
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
