On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:22:39PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 12/01/2017 09:32 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >> This will report the interrupt as handled even if we didn't see an > >> interrupt we understand which will break shared interrupt lines. At the > >> very least we should log other interrupt sources numerically. > > Okay, I think I can make that work by checking if no bits are set in the > > interrupt regs and returning early if not, IRQ_NONE. > This turned out to be more difficult than I expected, plus if I do > handle an interrupt it doesn't mean the other device did not right? So > this wouldn't fix shared lines as far as I can tell, but I don't > register it as shared so this should be fine. It'll mean that we don't offer the interrupt to anything else sharing the line. > As for your other suggestion of "log other interrupt sources > numerically", could you explain this or point to an example of what you > mean? Just print out the bits that were set.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
