On 2017-12-03 12:12, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Right. However, the patch adding that should have been sent to me, the >> maintainer of the driver. That is carefully recorded in MAINTAINERS. So, >> forgive me for assuming that nothing had changed in the driver behind my >> back. >> >> Had that patch been sent my way as it should have been, I would have >> insisted that maintenance of the bindings had been kept together with >> the maintenance of the driver. > > When I sent this patch ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl did lot list your > name, so that's why I did not put you on Cc, sorry. > > 4.15-rc1 still does not list you, but linux-next does. That's funny, because I get the below on both 4.14 and 4.15-rc1. And I expect the same ever since the driver was added some 3 years ago. $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl your-patch-from[1].diff | grep Peter Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:NXP TFA9879 DRIVER) [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/815930/ By the way, scripts/checkpatch.pl on that patch reports WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? > Would you like me to send the following patch so that new binding > updates go to you? Naahh, I'll claim it myself, that way I can clean up some nits in the actual file while at it... Cheers, Peter > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -9808,6 +9808,7 @@ NXP TFA9879 DRIVER > M: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > L: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers) > S: Maintained > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tfa9879.txt > F: sound/soc/codecs/tfa9879* > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
