On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:16:52AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:04:58 +0100, >> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:38:35PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> > > On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 03:01:20 +0100, >> > > Ruslan Bilovol wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Recently released USB Audio Class 3.0 specification >> > > > introduces many significant changes comparing to >> > > > previous versions, like >> > > > - new Power Domains, support for LPM/L1 >> > > > - new Cluster descriptor >> > > > - changed layout of all class-specific descriptors >> > > > - new High Capability descriptors >> > > > - New class-specific String descriptors >> > > > - new and removed units >> > > > - additional sources for interrupts >> > > > - removed Type II Audio Data Formats >> > > > - ... and many other things (check spec) >> > > > >> > > > It also provides backward compatibility through >> > > > multiple configurations, as well as requires >> > > > mandatory support for BADD (Basic Audio Device >> > > > Definition) on each ADC3.0 compliant device >> > > > >> > > > This patch adds initial support of UAC3 specification >> > > > that is enough for Generic I/O Profile (BAOF, BAIF) >> > > > device support from BADD document. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > > The patch looks good, but the timing is fairly late for merging to >> > > 4.15. >> > >> > Isn't kbuild barfing all over these? Is that because of the cross-tree >> > changes needed? >> >> No, it's just local to the audio driver, plus a few >> include/linux/usb/*.h modification / addition. >> So there shouldn't be a big breakage in that regard. The UAC3 gadget driver (which I sent to linux-usb mailing list) depends on a new audio-v3.h header which is a part of this patch. So Felipe's tree will have dependency on Takashi's tree; and that's why kbuild notifies about build failure of UAC3 gadget driver. >> >> >> > > So from my side, the primary question is whether the changes in USB >> > > (audio) header files are OK for USB guys. >> > > >> > > Greg, could you check these changes and give an ack if it's OK to >> > > merge? Or if you prefer postpone, just let me know. >> > >> > I don't object to the USB header changes, as long as the fixes you point >> > out are made :) >> >> Good to hear. >> Could you give your acked-by once after reviewing the patch? > > I'm guessing there will be a new patch? I'll be glad to review that > one. Sure, there will be a new patch set soon. Thanks, Ruslan _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel