On Nov 7 2017 16:59, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 01:34:02 +0100,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
This commit deprecates some APIs related to the dimension information. They
are planned to be removed in a development period for Linux kernel v4.21.
IMO, the version to deprecate the feature may depend on LTS kernel
version. 4.21 looks OK, but we may shift it.
I still get no merit of your suggestion. Do you mean that the removal
of ABI should be done in several releases before target LTS will be
actually released, to produce stable ABI? If so, we need to estimate
the timing of next LTS. However, it's hard because for recent LTS we
got no official announcement from stable maintainers till LTS version
of Linux kernel is actually released. At least, I won't work with such
uncertain estimations.
The feature removal isn't what we can guarantee at a certain kernel
version. As long as we have a real (not theoretical) user, it
shouldn't be dropped. It's still unwritten "no regression" rule.
That said, we may announce and prepare / plan the deprecation, but we
can't define the exact kernel version in general. And considering LTS
release is one of the decision factors.
If it comes from a general theory, I'm willing to follow it.
But in this case, we can be optimistic. As you know, the minor feature
is just used in drivers/software related to models produced by Echo
Digital Audio corp. The other probability is usage by user-defined
control element set on any userspace application. As my recent work
declared, this feature has been long-abandoned and no application exists
(if such application exists, developers have already found such bugs
which I've fixed recently before I worked...).
If the feature were used by majority, it would be more difficult to
deprecate/remove it, and we need to be deliberate. Depending on cases,
deprecation is impossible itself. But this feature is quite minor and
got little popularity. Practically, we can safely remove the minor
feature in any timing after modified version of echoaudio stuffs are
disseminated. My proposed schedule takes 6 kernel releases for it. In
the schedule, v4.21 release is the deadline of the feature, but if you'd
like to keep the deadline undecided for such theory/rule, I have no
objection to it. To me, deprecation of this feature for future removal
is more important to avoid developers' misuses to which I addressed,
than actual removal.
[1]
https://github.com/takaswie/presentations/blob/master/20171027/contents.md
Regards
Takashi Sakamoto
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
