On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 02:05:30PM +0100, Sergej Sawazki wrote: > Am 03.11.2017 um 12:45 schrieb Mark Brown: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:23:02PM +0100, Sergej Sawazki wrote: > > > After checking the code and the datasheet, it seems like we are handling > > > the clock inversion (SND_SOC_DAIFMT_NB_IF and SND_SOC_DAIFMT_IB_IF) not > > > correctly. > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > It applies against "for-next" (e67852427fb). Is it the wrong branch? It didn't apply against my current for-next branch when I tried, are you sure you were working with something up to date? I don't even have a copy of that commit locally, even in the reflog... In general I apply things against any existing topic branch for the part, or against any fixes branch, or against Linus' tags. Exactly what depends on what kind of change it is and if there's a branch already there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
