On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:18:04 +0200,
> Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>> The struct snd_pcm_status will use 'timespec' type variables to record
>> timestamp, which is not year 2038 safe on 32bits system.
>>
>> Userspace will use SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_STATUS and SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_STATUS_EXT
>> as commands to issue ioctl() to fill the 'snd_pcm_status' structure in
>> userspace. The command number is always defined through _IOR/_IOW/IORW,
>> so when userspace changes the definition of 'struct timespec' to use
>> 64-bit types, the command number also changes.
>>
>> Thus in the kernel, we now need to define two versions of each such ioctl
>> and corresponding ioctl commands to handle 32bit time_t and 64bit time_t
>> in native mode:
>> struct snd_pcm_status32 {
>> ......
>> struct { s32 tv_sec; s32 tv_nsec; } trigger_tstamp;
>> struct { s32 tv_sec; s32 tv_nsec; } tstamp;
>> ......
>> }
>>
>> struct snd_pcm_status64 {
>> ......
>> struct { s64 tv_sec; s64 tv_nsec; } trigger_tstamp;
>> struct { s64 tv_sec; s64 tv_nsec; } tstamp;
>> ......
>> }
>
> I'm confused. It's different from timespec64? So 32bit user-space
> would need to use a new own-type timespec instead of the standard
> timespec that is compliant with y2038?
It's complicated:
The definition of 'timespec' that user space sees comes from glibc,
and while that currently uses the traditional '{ long tv_sec;
long tv_nsec; }' definition, it will have to change to something like
(still simplified):
#if __32BIT && __64_BIT_TIME_T
typedef long long time_t;
#else
typedef long time_t;
#endif
struct timespec {
time_t tv_sec;
#if __BIG_ENDIAN && __32BIT && __64_BIT_TIME_T
unsigned int :32;
#endif
long tv_nsec;
#if __LITTLE_ENDIAN && __32BIT && __64_BIT_TIME_T
unsigned int pad;
#endif
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
which matches the layout that a 64-bit kernel uses, aside
from the nanosecond padding.
The kernel uses timespec64 internally, which is defined as
"{ s64 tv_sec; long tv_nsec };", so this has the padding
in a different place on big-endian architectures, and has a
different alignment and size on i386. We plan to introduce
a 'struct __kernel_timespec' that is compatible with the
__64_BIT_TIME_T version of the user timespec, but that
doesn't exist yet.
If you prefer, we can probably introduce it now with Baolin's
series, I think Deepa was planning to post a patch to add
it soon anyway.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
