On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been > > reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the > > I've been fine with them for ages. > > > other affected Maintainers how they want to deal with the patch. > > Far more often than not, the the solution is just to take the set > > through the MFD tree. > > It really helps if we can get the earlier parts of the series moving > even if the rest of it's in review still - I know I back off on > reviewing things if it looks like their dependencies aren't making > progress. Just for your FYI, I tend to review my parts then wait for the rest of the series to be reviewed, then discuss how the set should be handled. Holding back on reviewing your parts is not a good idea. If everyone did that we'd end up in a circular Maintainer dependency and nothing would ever get reviewed. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
