On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:03:21PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> > +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops dmic_dai_ops = {
> > + .trigger = dmic_daiops_trigger,
> > +};
> should it be handle by trigger or DAPM?
DAPM is a bit better, yes. I don't think it matters *overly* much in
this case where there's nothing else going on with the device, though
bypass use cases would need it. OTOH it could mess up the timing. I
was on the edge with this one but I decided that if it ends up making
a problem the binding is fine and the code can be sorted later.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
