On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:06:23PM +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> If (quirks & QUIRK_SEC_DAI == 0) then samsung_i2s_probe() doesn't allocate
> sec_dai and pri_dai->sec_dai remains Null, but samsung_i2s_remove()
> performs pri_dai->sec_dai dereference in any case.
>
> The patch adds sec_dai check on Null before derefence at
> samsung_i2s_remove().
No, I think this patch does not any check.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vasilyev <vasilyev@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Drop initialization of sec_dai by NULL at samsung_i2s_remove
> as Sylwester Nawrocki suggest.
> ---
> v3: Fix typo in the comment
> ---
> sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c b/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c
> index af3ba4d..6f896e3 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c
> @@ -1376,13 +1376,9 @@ static int samsung_i2s_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int samsung_i2s_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct i2s_dai *pri_dai, *sec_dai;
> + struct i2s_dai *pri_dai;
>
> pri_dai = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> - sec_dai = pri_dai->sec_dai;
> -
> - pri_dai->sec_dai = NULL;
> - sec_dai->pri_dai = NULL;
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
