Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:43:58 +0200,
> Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> +static struct bus_type ac97_bus_type = {
>> + .name = "ac97",
>
> Name-conflict with the old ac97 bus?
Yeah, fair point. So what should I choose for this new one ?
- ac97new
- ac97bis
- ac97_2
- ac97reborn
>> +static int __init ac97_bus_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return bus_register(&ac97_bus_type);
>> +}
>> +subsys_initcall(ac97_bus_init);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>");
>
> No bus_unregister() at exit?
Mmmh, that's because I used subsys_initcall(), which doesn't look good in a
module compilation setup. That will require a module_init(), and I will think
about how to implement it and test it for next iteration.
Cheers.
--
Robert
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
