On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 11:01 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:28:55PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 18:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I'm still a bit unclear about how a pipeline and effect are different > > > from an ASoC point of view - it matters on the DSP but from the kernel's > > > point of view a pipeline just an effect that happens to have a more > > > complicated implementation on the DSP? > > > Yes, that's true, some of the objects will most likely be treated the > > same by the kernel core but for the DSP and driver they will different. > > i.e. they create different objects with different topology private data > > (using the widget ID to differentiate). > > Shouldn't that just be handled in the driver though? Nothing outside > the driver cares. We're going to need to differentiate between > different effects and pipelines in the driver anyway. It can be, just a little more code in the driver that's all. I'll remove the pipeline widget and resend. Thanks Liam _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
