On Jun 12 2017 02:03, Takashi Iwai wrote:
This cover letter texts have much better explanation than the description in your patch itself. Why not putting such an excellent example in the change log?
This report depends on my original research somehow. Source for this embedded board is from VIA Tech. Inc. and not mainlined yet. Furthermore, I prepared for backport patches by my self. Totally, it might not be reproductive as is entirely. This is a reason that I wrote the report in the cover letter.
However, I believe that the others can get the similar result on the other boards based on ARM architecture, because ALSA stuffs are written as they work what I report. In this meaning, it's worth to put the report into the change log.
I'm OK to post revised version. Thanks Takashi Sakamoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
