On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function
> sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it
> was never used. ...but a quick look at the code shows that we should
> also be able to remove the sst_save_shim64() function and the
> structure members we were storing data in.
>
> Note that the saving code (and the comments talking about how
> important it is to do the save) has been around since
> commit 336cfbb05edf ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld- add ACPI module").
While I like "-" statistics, the below I think should be preserved if
it's repeating real registers layout.
> struct sst_shim_regs64 {
> - u64 csr;
> u64 pisr;
> u64 pimr;
> u64 isrx;
> u64 isrd;
> - u64 imrx;
> u64 imrd;
> u64 ipcx;
> u64 ipcd;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
