On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:33:45 +0200,
Bhumika Goyal wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 May 2017 13:38:56 +0200,
> > Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> >>
> >> Declare snd_kcontrol_new structures as const as they are only passed an
> >> argument to the function snd_ctl_new1. This argument is of type const,
> >> so snd_kcontrol_new structures having this property can be made const.
> >> Done using Coccinelle:
> >>
> >> @r disable optional_qualifier@
> >> identifier x;
> >> position p;
> >> @@
> >> static struct snd_kcontrol_new x@p={...};
> >>
> >> @ok@
> >> identifier r.x;
> >> position p;
> >> @@
> >> snd_ctl_new1(&x@p,...)
> >>
> >> @bad@
> >> position p != {r.p,ok.p};
> >> identifier r.x;
> >> @@
> >> x@p
> >>
> >> @depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
> >> identifier r.x;
> >> @@
> >> +const
> >> struct snd_kcontrol_new x;
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > As I already asked, could you send as a patchset if you have multiple
> > similar patches?
> >
>
> Sure. Will combine the already sent ones and some new ones into a
> patchset and send again.
Well, since there haven't been new submissions and the patches are
trivial, I applied the existing four patches. If you have newer ones,
please submit as a patchset.
thanks,
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
