On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:27:56AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > But, looking at the tree again, I noticed that ALSA isn't built yet at > all for m68k. I don't remember why it's disabled. > Jaroslav, do you know the reason behind it? Might also just be because the m68k port had been dead in Debian for a while due the lack of TLS support in glibc on m68k. However, the port is active again and in pretty good shape now. I'm currently working on fixing debian-installer on m68k, so that people can install the port without having to resort to things like debootstrap. > And, dmasound is a completely different implementation from the other > OSS, thus it doesn't suffer from set_fs() hack. That is, we may still > keep dmasound, while removing other OSS stuff. Thanks! Highly appreciated. > Meanwhile we'll try to support ALSA on m64k and eventually target to > drop dmasound stuff. Ooooh, that would be awesome. If you need any testers on m68k, please let us know. I have plenty of m68k hardware for testing. > Does it sound more feasible? No idea whether it's feasible. But it sounds awesome :). Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
