The patch ASoC: da7213: Fix incorrect usage of bitwise '&' operator for SRM check has been applied to the asoc tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From 14f814fbedd749992476bb365b454b2170b3b225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 16:15:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: da7213: Fix incorrect usage of bitwise '&' operator for SRM check In the SRM lock check section of code the '&' bitwise operator is used as part of checking lock status. Functionally the code works as intended, but the conditional statement is a boolean comparison so should really use '&&' logical operator instead. This commit rectifies this discrepancy. Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c index 6dd7578f0bb8..024d83fa6a7f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int da7213_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, ++i; msleep(50); } - } while ((i < DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES) & (!srm_lock)); + } while ((i < DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES) && (!srm_lock)); if (!srm_lock) dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n"); -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
