On 05/07/2017 12:12 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Hi,
Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 10:57 -0600, Stephen Warren a écrit :
On 04/24/2017 12:41 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le lundi 24 avril 2017 à 09:35 -0600, Stephen Warren a écrit :
On 04/24/2017 09:07 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le mercredi 19 avril 2017 à 16:00 -0600, Stephen Warren a écrit :
On 04/18/2017 10:38 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le mardi 18 avril 2017 à 10:15 -0600, Stephen Warren a écrit :
On 04/18/2017 09:11 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
This selects the tegra30 i2s and ahub controllers for the
tegra124
SoC.
These are needed when building without ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC set.
diff --git a/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig b/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig
index efbe8d4c019e..bcd18d2cf7a7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ config SND_SOC_TEGRA20_SPDIF
config SND_SOC_TEGRA30_AHUB
tristate
- depends on SND_SOC_TEGRA && ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
+ depends on SND_SOC_TEGRA && (ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC ||
ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC)
Is this really a compile-time dependency?
From a quick look at the code, I doubt this is really a build
dependency.
If so, don't we need to add T210 and T186 entries into that ||
condition
too,
since we could be building a kernel with just T210/T186 support
and no
T124
support?
In the spirit of this patch, adding entries for other tegra
platforms
would
make
sense. Would you prefer that we leave out the dependency from
SND_SOC_TEGRA30_*
and only select the right I2S driver to use in each codec driver?
If not, we'd have to list all relevant platforms both in the
I2S/AHUB
drivers
and in each codec's rules (which is not necessarily and issue, but
there's
no
need to have artificial platform dependencies).
What do you think?
I think we should just remove most of these "depends on" since they're
mostly set up to reflect runtime requirements rather than build time
requirements. The only points I'd make are:
I definitely agree we should do that for all the codec Kconfig options.
1)
Everything should "depends on SND_SOC_TEGRA" simply so the options
don't
show up and clutter menuconfig menus unless SND_SOC_TEGRA is enabled.
Agreed.
2)
SND_SOC_TEGRA30_I2S does need the Tegra30 AHUB driver in order to
compile/link, since it directly calls functions in that driver. This
is
already handled by SND_SOC_TEGRA30_I2S doing "select
SND_SOC_TEGRA30_AHUB".
Agreed.
3)
The machine drivers all do e.g. "select SND_SOC_TEGRA30_I2S if
ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC". This was an attempt to make the machine drivers
only
pull in the relevant drivers for the SoC(s) being compiled for. I'm
not
sure this still makes sense; this won't work on kernels that only
support T124/T210/T186 since ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC isn't enabled then.
Should we just remove all those and make sure the defconfigs are
updated
to make sure the relevant I2S/AHUB/SPDIF/AC97 drivers are explicitly
enabled? Perhaps we should default all the I2S/AHUB/SPDIF/AC97 to y
(which will only apply if SND_SOC_TEGRA is enabled)?
I think it would be easier for everyone to just auto-select the machine
drivers
automatically based on the architecture (so we could have the list of
ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC here) when SND_SOC_TEGRA is selected.
I don't think selecting the machine drivers is the correct approach,
since then they can't be disabled.
Making certain machine drivers "default y if ARCH_TEGRA_nn_SOC" would
address that,
That's right, my mistake. Let's take that as the solution I'm backing then.
but still isn't very scalable since we need to go back and
edit the Kconfig every time we define a new SoC, in order to add that
SoC into the default statement.
Well, that's what platform bringup is all about, isn't it? I think it makes
a
lot more sense to have to add a new platform once (and it's not like one
will
forget to look at the sound part when adding a new platform) rather than
requiring users to hand-pick the option.
Personally I'd expect all the Tegra machine drivers to be enabled in the
upstream defconfig files all the time, such that we don't need to make
the Kconfig options default y, nor have users manually turn the relevant
options on, at all.
I think I was previously mistaken about what the machine drivers are, so I got a
good occasion to find out about them an learn something new. Thanks!
Agreed regarding the machine drivers, they should indeed all be enabled in the
defconfig by default.
Not only does this preserve existing configs (including external ones
that
aren't part of the kernel tree), it also clearly maps which machine
driver
to use for which SoC instead of having users do it by hand.
The machine drivers aren't terribly tied to SoCs by design; most of them
would work on pretty much any SoC. They're only tied to SoCs as a
side-effect of a machine driver being tied to a certain CODEC, and
certain CODECS just by chance are only used (so far) on specific boards,
which have specific SoCs.
I'm a bit confused: aren't the machine driver (i2s/ahub/spdif/ac97) tied to
specific hardware blocks that are found in specific SoCs and not in others?
I
can see these blocks haven't evolved much across generations, but they're
still
either part of a specific SoC or not, aren't they?
The compatible strings in the common SoC dts seem to indicate that only one
of
these blocks is found at a time.
There are SoC-specific drivers for the components (Tegra20 I2S, Tegra30
I2S, etc.), but the *machine* drivers generally don't know anything
about that. DT instantiates the correct component drivers for the SoC,
and the machine driver just uses whatever it's linked to without caring
too-much/at-all about whether it's hooked to a Tegra20 I2S or a Tegra30
I2S device.
That makes sense now. Regarding the SoC-specific components, would you agree
with auto-selecting those based on ARCH_TEGRA_xx_SOC so that only the required
drivers are pulled-in? Otherwise, I'm also fine with explicitely enabling them
in the defconfig at this point.
I believe we don't generally "select" Kconfig options that aren't
absolutely required for basic system operation, since we don't want to
select stuff that's optional. Enabling the options in defconfig seems
like the right approach, or perhaps "default y" (in which case anyone
who doesn't want them can simply turn them off).
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
