On 02 May 2017 14:33, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> AND bitwise operation is used for retry counter and lock status, however in
> this case, it's invalid as condition statement.
>
> This commit fixes this bug with simpler representation. This bug is
> detected by sparse with below warning:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c:775:57: warning: dubious: x & !y
>
> Fixes: d575b0b0f01a ("ASoC: da7213: Add checking of SRM lock status before
> enabling DAI")
Agreed that the current '&' operator usage is technically invalid although the
code does operate correctly. Would rather you just change '&' to '&&' here
though rather than refactoring as I think the existing representation is clearer
to read in my opinion, and it's just a 1 line change. Please take that approach.
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.4+
> Cc: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
> index 6dd7578..11d257c 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
> @@ -737,7 +737,6 @@ static int da7213_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget
> *w,
> struct da7213_priv *da7213 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
> u8 pll_ctrl, pll_status;
> int i = 0;
> - bool srm_lock = false;
>
> switch (event) {
> case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
> @@ -766,15 +765,12 @@ static int da7213_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget
> *w,
> /* Check SRM has locked */
> do {
> pll_status = snd_soc_read(codec, DA7213_PLL_STATUS);
> - if (pll_status & DA7219_PLL_SRM_LOCK) {
> - srm_lock = true;
> - } else {
> - ++i;
> - msleep(50);
> - }
> - } while ((i < DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES) & (!srm_lock));
> + if (pll_status & DA7219_PLL_SRM_LOCK)
> + break;
> + msleep(50);
> + } while (++i < DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES);
>
> - if (!srm_lock)
> + if (i >= DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES)
> dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n");
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
