On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:32:14PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:27:38 +0200, > > > > So we should add the remaining one byt-max98090.c as Takashi fixed > > byt-rt5640.c one. I will send the patch for this one. > > Or maybe we should replace these definitions with some macro to expand > to the mostly same contents? The difference is just a few callback > functions, basically. And while at it, I cant help but wonder but if we can do better and mark it in platform driver thus avoiding it replication in machines. Afterall the atomic trigger is a platform property. Thanks -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
