On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:01:57PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > On Mar 14 2017 01:50, Mark Brown wrote: > > Did you write this or did Wei Yongjun? If they did then the patch > > should show them as the author. > I'm sure that you've rejected such a patch in which sender is not commit > author. With this memory, I sent this patch with my name as author > regardless of original author. No, I've never done that. What I complain about is people sending patches that they wrote themselves but which have different authorship information in the file, usually because they've used a different e-mail address. This is a problem because it makes it look like it's a patch that needs at least two signoffs as it wasn't written by the person sending it so slows things down. If there are actually two signoffs there's no problem at all as that's what's expected. If you look at git you'll see I fairly regularly apply patches which were forwarded by someone else. > What fashion is suitable for you? Please give me enough instruction to your > fashion in this case, Mark. I'm puzzled. Please follow the process covered in SubmittingPatches - if you're forwarding on a patch someone else wrote you need to preserve their authorship and add your own signoff after theirs.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
