On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:52:56PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > Sure, I can understand frustration with essentially contentless "bug > reports." And I got frustrated by a seemingly pat response that was > (IMO) a bit mistargeted. It *is* a pat response, it's one of the things I find I have to send often enough that I've got a canned response for it - I find that if I don't do things like that then after a while what gets sent becomes so brief that unless you're really familiar with what's being said it can be hard to understand the feedback. It's tricky though because as you say it's fairly obvious it's a form letter. > BTW, I don't see the patch applied anywhere (and I have no reply - > either manual or automated/patchwork - other than the above quote to say > it was). 20170309102819.bx5paxtffvmvmuov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fix/core Didn't seem to have made -next today, guess it'll hit tomorrow.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
