Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: da7213: add ACPI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/13/17 11:10 AM, Adam Thomson wrote:
On 10 March 2017 00:19, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

Add DLGS7212 and DLGS7213 HID

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
index 12da558..6dd7578 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  * option) any later version.
  */

+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
@@ -1528,12 +1529,23 @@ static int da7213_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_codec
*codec,
 	return 0;
 }

+#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
 /* DT */
 static const struct of_device_id da7213_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "dlg,da7213", },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, da7213_of_match);
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id da7213_acpi_match[] = {
+	{ "DLGS7212", 0},
+	{ "DLGS7213", 0},
+	{ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, da7213_acpi_match);
+#endif

The #ifdefs aren't strictly necessary here so might be cleaner to remove them.

Looks like Mark applied the patch already. We've had all sort of reports in the past that everything need to build without ACPI so I prefer to err on the cautious side.



 static enum da7213_micbias_voltage
 	da7213_of_micbias_lvl(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, u32 val)
@@ -1844,6 +1856,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver da7213_i2c_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "da7213",
 		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(da7213_of_match),
+		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(da7213_acpi_match),
 	},
 	.probe		= da7213_i2c_probe,
 	.remove		= da7213_remove,
--
2.7.4

As a general comment, it would be nice if the current of_property_read_* calls
could be converted to device_property_read_* calls instead, so both ACPI and DT
initialisation of bindings is supported.

It's something we can test with the MinnowBoard by just adding _DSD properties to the ACPI definitions. But I am not too hot on doing this myself since I have no ARM platform to test for non-regressions.


_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux