On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:07:43PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> These two evaluation have the same value, a pointer to the first element
> of the array.
> This kind of address operation is not good for readers, because it easily
> brings confusions as an address operations to pointers. For example,
This is done explicitly for clarity, in order to make it clear that the
value is a pointer rather than being (say) an integer. The value is the
same as you say but that's only clear if the reader realizes that data
is an array. If I were clarifying this I'd change to explicitly take
the address of the first element of the array rather than the array as
a whole.
> Cc: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: f831b055ecec ("ASoC: core: Add support for masking out parts of coefficient blocks")
This is a style change rather than a fix.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
