31.01.2017, 00:41, "Vinod Koul" <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:33:29AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> As 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC has the same DMA engine with H3, the DMA >> driver should be allowed to be built for ARM64, in order to make it work on H5. >> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Patch introduced between v1 and v2, to satisfy the newly added H3/H5 audio >> codec support. >> >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig >> index 0d6a96ee9fc7..d01d59812cf3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig >> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ config DMA_SUN4I >> >> config DMA_SUN6I >> tristate "Allwinner A31 SoCs DMA support" >> - depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || COMPILE_TEST >> + depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST > > Do we really need ARM64 here? also looking at others I wonder why isn't > this MACH_SUNXI...? You mean directly place "ARCH_SUNXI" here? SUN4I/SUN5I/SUN7I do not use DMA_SUN6I, they have different DMA controllers. > > -- > ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
