On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 07:38:53AM +1100, Eric Anholt wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > You don't appear to have sent this to any of the DRM maintainers - it > > does need review from them. > It was sent to dri-devel. That's us. And the patch already has a r-b > From DRM on it. I see. For most subsystems you need to actually copy a human to make sure that things are seen - just the list isn't enough. In terms of it being reviewed one of the problems with DRM not listing the reviwers in the MAINTAINERS file or anything is that it's very hard for anyone to tell if something is considered a good enough review or if it's just a review from someone who happens to contribute to DRM sometimes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
