On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:03:13PM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > As the overall delay is in range of seconds and the wait granularity > is 10ms msleep() seems more reasonable than to put load on the highres > timer subsystem. Thia also contains a whole bunch of other refactoring that's not mentioned in the changelog... > This does throw a checkpatch warning with: > WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms;" > but since this is in a loop and the intended granularity is > 10ms with up to 2 seconds total delay this seems ok. That does depend on how quickly the operation is expected to complete, the total delay is likely to be a massive overestimate.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
