On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:43:04 +0100, Alan Young wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for the delay. I too got sidetracked by other work. > > On 28/11/16 19:11, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >> >@@ -1083,15 +1115,17 @@ static int snd_pcm_rate_status(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_status_t * status) > >> > status->state = SND_PCM_STATE_RUNNING; > >> > status->trigger_tstamp = rate->trigger_tstamp; > >> > } > >> >- snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr(pcm); > >> >+ snd_pcm_rate_sync_hwptr0(rate, status->hw_ptr); > > This can't work. > > > > I can fix it in my side, but OTOH, this made me wonder how you tested > > the patch... > > Why do you think that cannot work? I am pretty sure it is working just > fine for us but I am sure that it is possible that I have missed > something. Compare the argument you passed there and the function definition, it's obvious :) Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
