On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:00:58AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:30:25PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Well, the question is how generic the given platform-specific setup > > is. I guess we can keep the dmi thingy for a while, although we'll > > need more generic solution (or a pattern matching for a wider range of > > machines). > Mostly if people stuck to Intel ref designs, then it would same, which has > been a problem on embedded side, but who knows.. :( That's just not at all realistic - if the systems are only going to be supportable when people copy the reference designs verbatim then we're going to have serious problems, that's just not how things work in the real world (especially at the higher end of the market where there's a greater desire for differentiation).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
