On 2016年11月30日 00:22, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:15:57 +0100,
--- a/src/pcm/pcm_file.c 2013-07-08 14:31:36.000000000 +0200
+++ b/src/pcm/pcm_file.c 2015-05-04 16:26:10.413615403 +0200
@@ -698,6 +698,7 @@
.readi = snd_pcm_file_readi,
.readn = snd_pcm_file_readn,
.avail_update = snd_pcm_generic_avail_update,
+ .htimestamp = snd_pcm_generic_htimestamp,
.mmap_commit = snd_pcm_file_mmap_commit,
.poll_descriptors_count = snd_pcm_generic_poll_descriptors_count,
.poll_descriptors = snd_pcm_generic_poll_descriptors,
I oppose this application, because designated initialization is
already applied to the .htimestamp member.
...
.poll_descriptors = snd_pcm_generic_poll_descriptors,
.poll_revents = snd_pcm_generic_poll_revents,
.htimestamp = snd_pcm_generic_htimestamp,
Oops, 'snd_pcm_generic_real_htimestamp' is proper here...
};
Please see below commit:
pcm:file: add the missing htimestamp callback
http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-lib.git;a=commit;h=68ae0c72a53704d416fe77d4c612d1f88d791e02
This mistake causes below warning with -Woverride-init option.
pcm_file.c:714:16: warning: initialized field overwritten [-Woverride-init]
.htimestamp = snd_pcm_generic_real_htimestamp,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I guess mentor/ADIT developers works for former snapshot, then missed
to rebase to current mainline of alsa-lib. I suggest them to di
re-evaluation with current mainline without this patch.
I overlooked it, too. Now the commit got reverted.
Thanks.
Takashi Sakamoto
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
