Hello Vinod On 11/24/2016 06:14 AM, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: >> The same problem (same control names IIUC) existis on codec and SoC's, now >> that both have DSP, we can have DSP "Volume control"... >> >> Would this solve that as well..? > > No. It's not the aim of this patchset and out of its scope. > > However, in fact, we should seek good solution for the issue of > 'conflict of identification information of control element set added by > ALSA SoC part automatically'. > Solution only solves issue for DAIs that are statically linked to a PCM device on probe, In you case, link to PCM device is done during runtime through adpcm, right? Have you an example of a PCM control that you need to link to the PCM character device? >>> Application should be able to address the control using the >>> device field number, according to the PCM character device. >>> This patch allows to link DAI PCM controls to the PCM device. >> >> why is that part required..? Is the problem being solved to address a >> control uniquely or something else? It treats a PCM control uniquely, what do you have in mind when you say "or something else"? >> >>> During DAI_link probe, PCM controls are added after device field is forced >>> to the PCM device number. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> include/sound/soc-dai.h | 4 ++++ >>> sound/soc/soc-core.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) Regards, Arnaud _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
