On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:22:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:14:26PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:36:42PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > No, errors are errors and not displaying them just makes it harder for > > > people to debug things. If you don't want to see errors just change > > > your system configuratiion to hide them. > > > For sure I want to see all errors, but this is not hardware error nor > > kernel misconfiguration, so showing it to the user is a bit pointless. > > How do we know that it's not a kernel misconfiguration? It's common for > people to not build some of the component drivers they need. Is what you described really a misconfiguration? Enabling debug when something does not work seems obvious thing to do, but okay, perhaps anything bellow error level would make me happy enough. > > > If you don't like deferred probing please contribute to the efforts > > > to order probing. As a side note, which efforts are you reffering to here? > > I just tried to make it consistend to other subsystems where patches to > > silence deferred probing warnings are accepted... > > Which subsystems are these? We should look at fixing them... tty and usb for example. I do not consider wise to looking at them until this very subsystem gets fixed first to not distract ourselves ;-) (Also I have admit, that accepted patches hide error message on deferred probe only, but above occurs _also_ on deferred probe and yes, it would be nice to have that fixed) Best regards, ladis _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel