On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:20:10 +0200, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:24:59PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:43:25 +0200, > > Subhransu S. Prusty wrote: > > > > > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > When appl_ptr is updated let low-level driver know, e.g. to let the > > > low-level driver/hardware pre-fetch data opportunistically. > > > > > > The existing .ack callback could be used but it would need to be > > > extended with new arguments, resulting in multiple changes in legacy > > > code. > > > > I wouldn't mind changing these callers. They aren't so many, after > > all. > > Yes this was one of the discussions we had in the past. I don't recall the > conclusion so had recommened to keep as is and discuss here. > > Do you think it's better to do that or use a new one :) It's OK to change ack callback, and actually it'll be cleaner. But then it'll be a problem in the next patch, I suppose :) Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
