Samuel Thibault, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 14:12:05 +0200, wrote: > I'd just like to check something: do we agree that libasound must be > thread-safe by default (otherwise it breaks the application assumption > that it's thread-safe)? If so, then there are thread-safety bugs: Ok, now with the discussion on the portaudio list starting at https://lists.columbia.edu/pipermail/portaudio/2016-August/000599.html it seems the issue was in portaudio, which was hit by the locking behavior change. Samuel _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
