On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:26:02PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 8/17/16 5:50 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > You need to at least send clock API patches to the clock maintainers, > > since there's no build time dependency the normal thing would be that > > things will go through the clock tree. > so would you rebase your tree on the clock tree then? the longer this takes > the more reports we'll get of broken audio in for-next due to this missing > MCLK support. No, if there's any need to do a merge we'll do a merge. Does this actively break existing boards?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
