On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:31:27PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 8/11/16 3:42 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > > which changed the dependencies for CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH. > > The set of options Fedora selects means that > > CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH > > can't be selected. Is there another driver that's supposed to replace > > CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH on Bay Trail or do the dependencies > > need to be updated? The bugzilla has alsa-info for working and non- > > working cases and the Fedora config is attached. > If you remove support for all other baytrail options this driver should > still be there and selectable. We just can't support both this driver for > Chromebooks and the rest for other machines with the same distribution at > the moment. That sounds like a regression, what's the plan to fix it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
