Re: [PATCH 09/15] ALSA: line6: Add hwdep interface to access the POD control messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:02:21 +0200,
Andrej Krutak wrote:
> 
> We must do it this way, because e.g. POD X3 won't play any sound unless
> the host listens on the bulk EP, so we cannot export it only via libusb.
> 
> The driver currently doesn't use the bulk EP messages in other way,
> in future it could e.g. sense/modify volume(s).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrej Krutak <dev@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/uapi/sound/asound.h |   3 +-
>  sound/usb/line6/driver.c    | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  sound/usb/line6/driver.h    |  12 ++++
>  3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/sound/asound.h b/include/uapi/sound/asound.h
> index 609cadb..be353a7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/sound/asound.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/sound/asound.h
> @@ -106,9 +106,10 @@ enum {
>  	SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_FW_OXFW,	/* Oxford OXFW970/971 based device */
>  	SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_FW_DIGI00X,	/* Digidesign Digi 002/003 family */
>  	SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_FW_TASCAM,	/* TASCAM FireWire series */
> +	SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_LINE6,	/* Line6 USB processors */
>  
>  	/* Don't forget to change the following: */
> -	SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_LAST = SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_FW_TASCAM
> +	SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_LAST = SNDRV_HWDEP_IFACE_LINE6
>  };
>  
>  struct snd_hwdep_info {
> diff --git a/sound/usb/line6/driver.c b/sound/usb/line6/driver.c
> index 8a71d45..0a0e324 100644
> --- a/sound/usb/line6/driver.c
> +++ b/sound/usb/line6/driver.c
> @@ -14,9 +14,11 @@
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/usb.h>
> +#include <linux/circ_buf.h>
>  
>  #include <sound/core.h>
>  #include <sound/initval.h>
> +#include <sound/hwdep.h>
>  
>  #include "capture.h"
>  #include "driver.h"
> @@ -315,8 +317,11 @@ static void line6_data_received(struct urb *urb)
>  				line6->process_message(line6);
>  		}
>  	} else {
> +		line6->buffer_message = urb->transfer_buffer;
> +		line6->message_length = urb->actual_length;
>  		if (line6->process_message)
>  			line6->process_message(line6);
> +		line6->buffer_message = NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	line6_start_listen(line6);
> @@ -522,6 +527,163 @@ static void line6_get_interval(struct usb_line6 *line6)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +
> +/* Enable buffering of incoming messages, flush the buffer */
> +static int line6_hwdep_open(struct snd_hwdep *hw, struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct usb_line6 *line6 = hw->private_data;
> +
> +	/* NOTE: hwdep already provides atomicity (exclusive == true), but for
> +	 * sure... */
> +	if (test_and_set_bit(0, &line6->buffer_circular.active))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	line6->buffer_circular.head = 0;
> +	line6->buffer_circular.tail = 0;
> +	sema_init(&line6->buffer_circular.sem, 0);

Why do you use semaphore, not mutex?  And initializing at this
point...?  It looks racy.


> +	line6->buffer_circular.active = 1;

Looks superfluous, done in the above?


> +	line6->buffer_circular.data =
> +		kmalloc(LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXLEN * LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXCOUNT, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!line6->buffer_circular.data) {
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	line6->buffer_circular.data_len =
> +		kmalloc(sizeof(*line6->buffer_circular.data_len) *
> +			LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXCOUNT, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!line6->buffer_circular.data_len) {
> +		kfree(line6->buffer_circular.data);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Stop buffering */
> +static int line6_hwdep_release(struct snd_hwdep *hw, struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct usb_line6 *line6 = hw->private_data;
> +
> +	/* By this time, no readers are waiting, we can safely recreate the
> +	 * semaphore at next open. */
> +	line6->buffer_circular.active = 0;
> +
> +	kfree(line6->buffer_circular.data);
> +	kfree(line6->buffer_circular.data_len);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Read from circular buffer, return to user */
> +static long
> +line6_hwdep_read(struct snd_hwdep *hwdep, char __user *buf, long count,
> +					loff_t *offset)
> +{
> +	struct usb_line6 *line6 = hwdep->private_data;
> +	unsigned long tail;

No need to use long for FIFO index.


> +	if (down_interruptible(&line6->buffer_circular.sem)) {
> +		return -ERESTARTSYS;
> +	}
> +	/* There must an item now in the buffer... */
> +
> +	tail = line6->buffer_circular.tail;
> +
> +	if (line6->buffer_circular.data_len[tail] > count) {
> +		/* Buffer too small; allow re-read of the current item... */
> +		up(&line6->buffer_circular.sem);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (copy_to_user(buf,
> +		&line6->buffer_circular.data[tail * LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXLEN],
> +		line6->buffer_circular.data_len[tail])
> +	) {
> +		rv = -EFAULT;
> +		goto end;
> +	} else {
> +		rv = line6->buffer_circular.data_len[tail];
> +	}
> +
> +	smp_store_release(&line6->buffer_circular.tail,
> +				(tail + 1) & (LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXCOUNT - 1));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Write directly (no buffering) to device by user*/
> +static long
> +line6_hwdep_write(struct snd_hwdep *hwdep, const char __user *data, long count,
> +					loff_t *offset)
> +{
> +	struct usb_line6 *line6 = hwdep->private_data;
> +	int rv;
> +	char *data_copy;
> +
> +	data_copy = kmalloc(count, GFP_ATOMIC);

No need to use GFP_ATOMIC in this context.
Also, you should add the sanity check of the given size.  User may
pass any size of the write.


> +	if (!data_copy)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(data_copy, data, count))
> +		rv = -EFAULT;

Maybe easier to use memdup_user() helper.

> +	else
> +		rv = line6_send_raw_message(line6, data_copy, count);
> +
> +	kfree(data_copy);
> +	return rv;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct snd_hwdep_ops hwdep_ops = {
> +	.open    = line6_hwdep_open,
> +	.release = line6_hwdep_release,
> +	.read    = line6_hwdep_read,
> +	.write   = line6_hwdep_write,
> +};
> +
> +/* Insert into circular buffer */
> +static void line6_hwdep_push_message(struct usb_line6 *line6)
> +{
> +	unsigned long head = line6->buffer_circular.head;
> +	/* The spin_unlock() and next spin_lock() provide needed ordering. */
> +	unsigned long tail = ACCESS_ONCE(line6->buffer_circular.tail);
> +
> +	if (!line6->buffer_circular.active)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (CIRC_SPACE(head, tail, LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXCOUNT) >= 1) {
> +		unsigned char *item = &line6->buffer_circular.data[
> +			head * LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXLEN];
> +		memcpy(item, line6->buffer_message, line6->message_length);
> +		line6->buffer_circular.data_len[head] = line6->message_length;
> +
> +		smp_store_release(&line6->buffer_circular.head,
> +				  (head + 1) & (LINE6_MESSAGE_MAXCOUNT - 1));
> +		up(&line6->buffer_circular.sem);
> +	}

Hmm...  this kind of a simple FIFO can be seen in anywhere in the
kernel code, and I'm sure that you can find an easier way to implement
it.  The whole code looks a bit scary as it being home-brewed.

Also, the blocking read/write control isn't usually done by a
semaphore.  Then you can handle the interrupt there.


Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux