On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 21:13:54 +0200,
Trent Reed wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Trent Reed <treed0803@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Please don't drop Cc to ML. Also avoid top-post.
> >>
> >
> > Whoops! Sorry - not too familiar with the etiquette yet. (Dropped Cc was
> > an honest mistake, reply instead of reply-all).
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 09:02:12 +0200,
> >> Trent Reed wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks Takashi,
> >> >
> >> > My implementation does only use the "hw:N" devices, unfortunately - I am
> >> > not using MMAP because I was under the impression that you must poll
> >> when
> >> > directly accessing the hardware. And yes, 48kHz is the exact rate I'm
> >> > attempting. :(
> >> > I do have an update, though - I'm able to reproduce the issue quite
> >> simply
> >> > by running the ALSA test application latency with the following command:
> >> >
> >> > `latency -P <playback-device> -C <capture-device> -r 48000`
> >> >
> >> > This, as far as I understand from the source code, should open R/W
> >> > interleaved streams on ("hw:2" is what I'm using for both, though the
> >> > problem persists in non-duplex mode, e.g. "hw:2" "hw:0") in non-blocking
> >> > mode without polling.
> >> >
> >> > What happens is the latency application does normalize around some value
> >> > (say, 16ms roundtrip time), but the audio is awful and broken, a lot of
> >> > this "static" I'm talking about. It seems to me that it's the same
> >> problem
> >> > that I have in my above-mentioned sample code.
> >> >
> >> > I would love to help more, so if I can in any way, please let me know!
> >> But
> >> > I feel at a loss for how to further debug.
> >>
> >> The latency program is too complex to analyze the issue. Check
> >> arecord with --nonblock --test-nowait options and with the hw device.
> >> Does the issue happen always? Or does it depend on the buffer or
> >> period size?
> >
> >
> >> Takashi
> >>
> >
> > It doesn't happen always, but it usually happens more often than not -
> > sometimes I'll go a few attempts without hearing the issue, and other times
> > it'll be consistent. The only constant seems to be that I have never heard
> > it occur when I am running snd_pcm_wait() (e.g. without --test-nowait). I
> > will keep trying this though to see if that ever changes.
> >
> > Here are my attempted recordings:
> >
> > Non-Blocking, No-Wait (produces static):
> > `arecord -Dhw:2 -fS16_LE -r48000 -c2 --period-size=256 --nonblock
> > --test-nowait -d5 > s16le-c2-p256-nonblock-nowait.wav`
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-1aumGKQcQTR0ZtUFlaV1Q5cFU
> >
> > Non-Blocking, Wait (does not produce static):
> > `arecord -Dhw:2 -fS16_LE -r48000 -c2 --period-size=256 --nonblock -d5 >
> > s16le-c2-p256-nonblock-wait.wav`
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-1aumGKQcQTa2pGUWpTWmc1QW8
> >
> > At first, I thought it had to do with the period - but here I attempt to
> > use the default period for arecord (unsure of what the default gets set to).
> > `arecord -Dhw:2 -fS16_LE -r48000 -c2 --nonblock --test-nowait -d5 >
> > s16le-c2-nonblock-nowait.wav`
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-1aumGKQcQTa280VG9LbHlreU0
> >
> > To be absolutely sure that period size didn't play a role, I asked for a
> > specific size:
> > `arecord -Dhw:2 -fS16_LE -r48000 -c2 --period-size=1024 --nonblock
> > --test-nowait -d5 > s16le-c2-p1024-nonblock-nowait.wav`
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-1aumGKQcQTZlRCQ0lvek9YN3M
> >
> > And it doesn't appear to relate to the sample rate:
> > `arecord -Dhw:2 -fS16_LE -r44100 -c2 --nonblock --test-nowait -d5 >
> > s16le-44100-c2-nonblock-nowait.wav`
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-1aumGKQcQTZFNmTGt5VXJKQTg
> >
> > I also can get it to reproduce using --mmap flag:
> > `arecord -Dhw:2 -fS16_LE -r48000 -c2 --nonblock --test-nowait --mmap -d5 >
> > s16le-c2-mmap-nonblock-nowait.wav`
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-1aumGKQcQTWDZ6cFlSZjA5ek0
> >
> > Let me know how I can help further debug. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Trent Reed
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > - Trent Reed
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 23:58:28 +0200,
> >> > > Trent Reed wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > (Ping)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm afraid I still don't understand why this is failing. I found
> >> that a
> >> > > > call to sdn_pcm_wait() when -EAGAIN is returned fixes the problem
> >> because
> >> > > > it waits for samples to be ready, but I don't understand why it is a
> >> > > > problem in the first place. Much of the sample code is written in a
> >> way
> >> > > > that suggests that the call to snd_pcm_wait() is optional, and only
> >> > > > required when directly reading/writing from the device (MMAP, I'm
> >> not
> >> > > doing
> >> > > > this).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm just wondering what is wrong with basically looping over a call
> >> to
> >> > > > snd_pcm_readi() in non-blocking mode, reacting to errors, and
> >> capturing
> >> > > > frames. This produces awful static (which is basically garbage
> >> samples),
> >> > > is
> >> > > > it a requirement that I call snd_pcm_wait() when -EAGAIN is passed
> >> back
> >> > > to
> >> > > > wait for a full period to be ready?
> >> > >
> >> > > Well, in the API level, it should work as you expected. So there must
> >> > > be definitely some bug(s). But it's hard to spot out, as there are
> >> > > several layers behind the scene.
> >> > >
> >> > > As a first shot, try to reproduce without alsa-lib plugins, i.e. only
> >> > > with "hw" PCM device, if not done yet. Also, it's interesting to see
> >> > > whether it happens with or without mmap r/w.
> >> > >
> >> > > Another point is whether it depends on the parameter. Did you try
> >> > > 48kHz instead of 44.1kHz?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Takashi
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > - Trent Reed
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Trent Reed <treed0803@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hey All,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I've been banging my head against the wall for about a week on
> >> this
> >> > > bug.
> >> > > > > The following gist shows my sample reproduction code:
> >> > > > > https://gist.github.com/TReed0803/985c5d5c3d295245e19006a27be447
> >> c3
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I'm simply opening up a non-blocking PCM capture stream and
> >> writing the
> >> > > > > contents of the reads to stdout.
> >> > > > > (Originally, I was writing to the playback stream, but I was
> >> hearing
> >> > > this
> >> > > > > strange static occasionally!)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > It's the static I'm trying to debug. It doesn't happen every
> >> time. In
> >> > > > > fact, sometimes I'll go a few consecutive executions without
> >> hearing
> >> > > it.
> >> > > > > I was able to capture some of the bad data, and I loaded it up in
> >> > > Audacity
> >> > > > > for visualization:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-1aumGKQcQTcUJoZzIwRWhYSFE/
> >> view?usp=sharing
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > It looks like the internal buffer occasionally is sending me more
> >> data
> >> > > > > than it actually captured, and I end up either reading old PCM
> >> data
> >> > > from
> >> > > > > the internal ring buffer, or (at the very beginning) a bunch of
> >> zeros.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Can anyone help me understand what is going on? What could cause
> >> these
> >> > > > > definitely incorrect samples to be recorded? (I get the same
> >> effect
> >> > > > > regardless of hardware, but I will list hardware just in case.)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I hope I have all the information you might need:
> >> > > > > Hardware: Samson Meteor Mic (USB-Audio, USB Mixer) [Though, it
> >> even
> >> > > > > happens with my built-in microphone]
> >> > > > > ALSA version: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version
> >> > > > > k4.4.0-28-generic.
> >> > > > > apt-cache policy (installed alsa-lib version): 1.1.0-0ubuntu1
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > - Trent Reed
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > Alsa-devel mailing list
> >> > > > Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
> >> > > >
> >>
> >
> Hey Takashi,
>
> Just wondering if there is any update on this or if you need any more
> information? Were you able to repro this? Any way I can help?
Sorry, I really have no time to check this issue right now.
Hopefully someone else tackles it...
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
