I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/sparc/amd7930.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/sparc/amd7930.c b/sound/sparc/amd7930.c
index 35c1f6a..08edc86 100644
--- a/sound/sparc/amd7930.c
+++ b/sound/sparc/amd7930.c
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX; /* Index 0-MAX */
static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR; /* ID for this card */
static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; /* Enable this card */
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for Sun AMD7930 soundcard.");
-module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for Sun AMD7930 soundcard.");
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable Sun AMD7930 soundcard.");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Thomas K. Dyas and David S. Miller");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Sun AMD7930");
--
2.9.2
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
