On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > This device seems to be used on x86 systems so we'll need to ensure that
> > > they register clocks for this. They really should set this up using
> > > quirks keyed off DMI information or similar so it's hidden from other
> > > systems.
>
> > Hmm..the change defines this mclk as a optional property so I'm
> > not sure how it would affect x86 systems. (Would love to refine
>
> Ah, clk_prepare_enable() silently ignores NULL as an argument? It is a
> bit messy to do things that way but might be the most practical thing.
At least the one in the drivers/clk/clk.c does:
660 int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
661 {
662 int ret;
663
664 if (!clk)
665 return 0;
...
774 int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
775 {
776 unsigned long flags;
777 int ret;
778
779 if (!clk)
780 return 0;
> Hopefully they'll speak up - we're in the merge window anyway so it'll
> be just over a week before this can go into -next.
I see. Let's wait then.
Thanks
Nicolin
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
