Sparse reports below warnings.
rt5616.c:1270:24: warning: symbol 'rt5616_aif_dai_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
rt5616.c:1277:27: warning: symbol 'rt5616_dai' was not declared. Should it be static?
These two symbols are just used inner the file, thus it's better to add
static qualifier.
This commit adds it.
Fixes: b1d15059957d ('ASoC: rt5616: add rt5616 codec driver')
CC: Bard Liao <bardliao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c
index f527b5b..98ae326 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5616.c
@@ -1267,14 +1267,14 @@ static int rt5616_resume(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
#define RT5616_FORMATS (SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3LE | \
SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S8)
-struct snd_soc_dai_ops rt5616_aif_dai_ops = {
+static struct snd_soc_dai_ops rt5616_aif_dai_ops = {
.hw_params = rt5616_hw_params,
.set_fmt = rt5616_set_dai_fmt,
.set_sysclk = rt5616_set_dai_sysclk,
.set_pll = rt5616_set_dai_pll,
};
-struct snd_soc_dai_driver rt5616_dai[] = {
+static struct snd_soc_dai_driver rt5616_dai[] = {
{
.name = "rt5616-aif1",
.id = RT5616_AIF1,
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
