On Jul 1 2016 18:52, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>> Were I you, I would insert codes to evaluate the element of dimension >>>> info; i.e. >>>> >>>> if (info->dimen.d[i] > 512) >>>> break; >>>> >>>> Here, 512 is the maximum number of members which an element can have. In >>>> this case, it's certainly an element of byte type. >>> >>> It's superfluous. If info->count is already a sane value, it'd be >>> enough to compare with this. >> >> The info->count comes from userspace or each driver. It's dangerous to >> use it for avoiding arithmetic overflow. > > Your function is to verify the dimen array. And for that, a sane > info->count value is prerequisite. Otherwise how can you validate it > at all...? Hm. There's a large difference between us for the design of this local function. You're interested in the result of calculation, while I consider about the soundness of whole members in the dimension info. In this time, I'll follow your insistence. I'd like to save my time against this long-abandoned feature. Regards Takashi Sakamoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel