On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 20:13 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:43:57PM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
>
> > +static int mt2701_afe_i2s_set_clkdiv(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int div_id,
> > + int div)
> > +{
>
> Why are we adding a set_clkdiv() operation? I would expect the driver
> to be able to figure things out automatically.
>
> > + case DIV_ID_MCLK_TO_BCK:
> > + afe_priv->i2s_path[i2s_num].div_mclk_to_bck = div;
> > + break;
> > + case DIV_ID_BCK_TO_LRCK:
> > + afe_priv->i2s_path[i2s_num].div_bck_to_lrck = div;
> > + break;
>
> Especially in the case where we're configuring LRCLK, that's trivial
> when we know the sample rate which we have to know anyway.
Oh... actually I want to say 'div_mclk_over_bck' and 'div_bck_over_lrck'
I'll fix the naming if we decide to reserve the set_clkdiv() operation.
For div_bck_over_lrck, yes we only support bck = 64fs now so I'll remove
it. Maybe in the future we'll allow bck = 32fs for some board and I'll
send patch on that time.
For div_mclk_over_bck, mt2635 can offer 128fs and 256fs mclk to codec,
and it depends on the board so I tend to let machine driver configure
it. However, maybe changing it to div_mclk_over_lrck will be better.
I'll do the change.
BTW, some patch is applied for the patchset so I need not to send the
new version but send another patchset, right?
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
