On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:28:32 +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > > Is there anything else I can provide to help getting this issue fixed? > > The main issue is that snd_pcm_area_copy() gets called with overlapping > source and destination buffers, which triggers this assertion before a > memcpy: > > http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-lib.git;a=blob;f=src/pcm/pcm.c;h=0d0d093deb49f2db7d207b29b728df372cce84bc;hb=HEAD#l2762 Right, this isn't supposed to happen. > This happens when the system is really loaded (CPU-wise). > > Do you think the problem is likely to come from an incorrect API usage > from the application? Knowing this would significantly narrow down the > search, because the problem could also come from within alsa itself. > > The callling code from the application is quite complex, see here: > > https://github.com/savoirfairelinux/ring-daemon/blob/master/src/media/audio/alsa/alsalayer.cpp > > In particular, the assertion is triggered by the call to > snd_pcm_avail_update() at line 694 (see the stack trace below). I have too little time to investigate on this issue, but judging from the fact that there has been no such a report until now, I guess it's specific to your code. But I can't say sure, of course. Is the relevant code path accessed concurrently? The possible race is the first suspect I'd always think of in such a case. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel